PSD-95 inhibitor peptide studied for acute ischemic stroke neuroprotection. Designed to prevent excitotoxic neuronal death post-stroke. Phase 3 ESCAPE-NA1 trial completed with notable subgroup findings.
4 hours IV; designed for single acute administration in stroke setting
SKUs
1
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
NA-1 (nerinetide) is a neuroprotective peptide that was studied for reducing brain damage caused by stroke. It targets a pathway involved in how neurons die when blood supply is cut off. It completed a large phase 3 clinical trial, which produced nuanced results depending on treatment context — specifically whether patients received a clot-dissolving drug called tPA.
Ischemic Stroke Research
The ESCAPE-NA1 trial was a large phase 3 randomized trial that enrolled 1,105 patients with major ischemic stroke. All patients received endovascular treatment to remove the clot. The trial found no overall benefit of NA-1 over placebo on the primary outcome — but post-hoc analysis found that in patients who did not receive tPA, NA-1 significantly improved outcomes.
Neuroprotection Research
NA-1 was designed to interfere with a protein complex (PSD-95/NMDA receptor) that forms when neurons are starved of oxygen during stroke, accelerating their death. Blocking this complex was hypothesized to buy neurons time to survive until blood flow is restored.
Interaction with tPA
An unexpected finding in ESCAPE-NA1 was that tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) appeared to break down NA-1 rapidly, nullifying its effect. In patients who did not receive tPA, the neuroprotective signal was statistically significant. This has implications for future trial design in this space.
Phase 3 ESCAPE-NA1 trial: no overall benefit vs placebo on the primary disability outcome.
Significant improvement in outcomes for the subgroup of patients who did not receive tPA.
tPA appears to degrade NA-1, explaining the interaction in the trial data.
Favorable safety profile — no increase in adverse events compared to placebo.
Further development is ongoing with trial designs that account for the tPA interaction.
The ESCAPE-NA1 trial did not meet its primary endpoint overall, so NA-1 cannot be said to have proven efficacy for stroke. The positive subgroup finding (no-tPA patients) is a post-hoc analysis, which is hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Further trials are needed to validate the subgroup finding. NA-1 is not FDA-approved.
When a stroke cuts off blood supply to part of the brain, neurons in that area begin dying rapidly through a process that involves calcium flooding into cells through NMDA receptors, which are normally used for learning and memory. When too much calcium rushes in, neurons activate a self-destruction sequence. NA-1 is designed to block a scaffolding protein called PSD-95 that connects NMDA receptors to the downstream cell death machinery. By interrupting that connection, NA-1 aims to let calcium still flow through the receptor while preventing the cell death cascade from activating — buying neurons time to survive until blood flow is restored by clot removal.
NA-1 was well-tolerated in the phase 3 trial with no increase in adverse events, hemorrhagic transformation, or safety signals compared to placebo. It is not FDA-approved. Development is continuing in trial designs that account for the tPA interaction observed in ESCAPE-NA1.
Moderate Evidence
This compound has been studied in Phase 1 or Phase 2 human trials. Evidence is encouraging but more large-scale trials are needed.
Published Research Ranges
2.6mg/kg IV single dose in phase 3 trial (ESCAPE-NA1)
Research Context Only: These are ranges reported in published scientific studies for educational reference. They are not dosing recommendations. This is not medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sources listed here are from the platform research library. All links open the original publication. No citations are generated by AI.
Nerinetide (NA-1) for Neuroprotection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: ESCAPE-NA1 Trial
The Lancet • 2020
• DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-3
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial
Efficacy and safety of butylphthalide for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment (BAST trial): study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
Reperfusion and cytoprotective agents are a mutually beneficial pair in ischaemic stroke therapy: an overview of pathophysiology, pharmacological targets and candidate drugs focusing on excitotoxicity and free radical
Risk Factors, Pathophysiologic Mechanisms, and Potential Treatment Strategies of Futile Recanalization after Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in acute and chronic excitotoxicity: implications for preventive treatments of ischemic stroke and late-onset Alzheimer's disease
Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Spinal Cord Ischemia Following Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Translational Insights from Stroke and Traumatic Injury for Biomarker Development
Management of Incomplete Microcirculatory Reperfusion After Endovascular Thrombectomy: Focus on Inhibition of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Pathway
Research Education Only: This profile is for educational purposes only. All information is sourced from published scientific literature. This is not medical advice. Not for human consumption. Consult qualified medical professionals for any health decisions.
We use cookies to enhance your research experience and analyze platform usage. By continuing, you agree to our Cookie Policy.